bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BG
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '21 at 10:02
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 191
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 466
52% 411 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6970
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 27.2
21% 27.7 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 19.5
19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 316 314 317 315 316 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 457
Mixed 395
SusWrite 328
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 42.1
130% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 363
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 124%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 230 230 235 231 230 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 213
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 230
128% 177 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.4
273% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 127%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B485831363030433944332F344758202020 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback