Fujitsu ESPRIMO P900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P900  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3062-A1
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1842 x 1026 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150618
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 18 '21 at 08:50
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 171
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 334
45% 334 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 36.6
27% 34.7 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 23.4
25% 32 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
848GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 77 86 89 86 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 175
Write 120
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 83.1
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
229GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 118 123 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 127
Write 123
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 119
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 118 123 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 179
Write 173
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 119
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
754GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 19.4
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 26.2
30% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P900 Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $294
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback