Samsung R540/SA41/E452

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung R540/SA41/E452  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R540/SA41/E452
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '21 at 18:03
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 50.2
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 102
41% 69.1 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 140
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500
Sanyo(144D C07F) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.42% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.37 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.42%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 206 206 208 203 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.9% Average
Read 217
Write 98.5
Mixed 200
SusWrite 203
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 19.4
60% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 135
112% 162 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.1% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.4
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R540/SA41/E452 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R540/SA41/E452

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback