ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM 49Y6512

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	76GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 76GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	IBM 49Y6512 (all builds)
Memory	68.2 GB free of 76 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140507
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '17 at 09:51
Run Duration	441 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620 5,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 81.9 1-Core 62.4 2-Core 125 56% 89.6 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 408 36% 307 Pts	64-Core 576 36% 576 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.2% Above average	Lighting 74.6 Reflection 74.6 Parallax 65.1 61% 71.4 fps	MRender 70.3 Gravity 68.3 Splatting 67.4 56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID-MR10i 239GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.40 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	85.9% Excellent	Read 436 Write 385 Mixed 493 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 55 4K Write 30.7 4K Mixed 29.2 137% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 57.4 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 24.8 39% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 89%
IBM ServeRAID-MR10i 999GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 930GB free Firmware: 1.40 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 117 Write 52.4 Mixed 78.6 62% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.21 4K Mixed 0.15 113% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 71%
IBM ServeRAID-MR10i 999GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 806GB free Firmware: 1.40 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 107 Write 96.6 Mixed 98 76% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 0.49 4K Mixed 0.12 43% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 71%
IBM ServeRAID-MR10i 999GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 583GB free Firmware: 1.40 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 90.3 Write 103 Mixed 92.7 72% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.38 4K Mixed 0.14 35% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 71%
IBM ServeRAID-MR10i 499GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 441GB free Firmware: 1.40 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.4% Average	Read 92.6 Write 79.7 Mixed 75.2 62% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.15 47% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 113%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB 579 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 58GB free, PID 9917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	5.07% Terrible	Read 23.3 Write 3.58 Mixed 7.5 11% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.74 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.005 14% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 5.07% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 76GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 46% null MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.4% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.7 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback