Gigabyte GA-B560I AORUS PRO AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560I AORUS PRO AX  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 89.3
1-Core 170
2-Core 331
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 654
8-Core 989
102% 822 Pts
64-Core 1,181
73% 1,181 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 106%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 10.8
7% 11.5 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 0.3
6% 7.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X14c18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 71 35 38 48 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 351
Write 328
Mixed 239
SusWrite 53.7
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 4.8
51% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 178
133% 175 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) PSD44G240081 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B560I AORUS PRO AX Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560I AORUS PRO AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback