Elysiumspoofer-18133 Alienware Area-51m

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemElysiumspoofer-18133 Alienware Area-51m  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware Area-51m
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 17:31
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 930
79% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,427
88% 1,427 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 08C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.5% Average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 93
Parallax 67.9
41% 70.3 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 60
Splatting 71.8
46% 52.9 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 420 426 421 428 416 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 202
Write 370
Mixed 223
SusWrite 420
69% 304 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 29.3
104% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 227
172% 230 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 313%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
927GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1637 1684 1666 1538 1568 1564 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,091
Write 1,957
Mixed 1,695
SusWrite 1,609
413% 1,838 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 63.5
209% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 838
DQ Write 754
DQ Mixed 787
593% 793 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 282%
Great: 410%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
931GB free
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2000 2004 2014 2029 2101 1980 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 1,970
Write 1,992
Mixed 1,701
SusWrite 2,021
433% 1,921 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 62.3
201% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 881
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 612
451% 608 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 292%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 24.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Alienware Area-51m Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

System: Elysiumspoofer-18133 Alienware Area-51m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback