Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive381% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 94% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 17:26
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 94%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$230
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 75
1-Core 215
2-Core 421
121% 237 Pts
4-Core 834
8-Core 1,672
148% 1,253 Pts
64-Core 2,537
157% 2,537 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 34.4
Parallax 32.4
27% 33.2 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 33
Splatting 23
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
848GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1731 2083 2122 2179 2173 2174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
381% Outstanding
Read 2,407
Write 2,193
Mixed 1,590
SusWrite 2,077
464% 2,067 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 74.8
277% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,685
DQ Write 1612
DQ Mixed 1,652
1,239% 1,649 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 381%
Great: 370%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$220
2TB free
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2070 2075 2082 2078 2078 2075 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 2,052
Write 2,034
Mixed 1,571
SusWrite 2,076
436% 1,933 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 60.8
212% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,710
DQ Write 1,684
DQ Mixed 1,751
1,300% 1,715 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 349%
Great: 389%
Lacie Mobile Drive 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 116 120 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 84.6
Write 107
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 118
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
161% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$74
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 159 158 159 159 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 136
Write 151
Mixed 69
SusWrite 156
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
469GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 111 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 134
Write 124
Mixed 110
SusWrite 111
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 76%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
425GB free, PID 0212
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 89 89 89 89 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 83.9
Write 86.3
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 87.2
97% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GIS Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GIS 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.6% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 25.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 15,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $181

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback