Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive366% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 94% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 02:13
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 94%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$230
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 89.6
1-Core 211
2-Core 421
125% 240 Pts
4-Core 833
8-Core 1667
147% 1,250 Pts
64-Core 2,535
157% 2,535 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 34.2
Parallax 32.5
27% 33.1 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 22.8
25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
849GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1565 2152 2136 2189 2198 2192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
366% Outstanding
Read 2,331
Write 2,082
Mixed 1,605
SusWrite 2,072
455% 2,022 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 63.9
270% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,689
DQ Write 1,216
DQ Mixed 1,373
1,047% 1,426 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 366%
Great: 370%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$220
2TB free
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2136 2139 2141 2135 2139 2137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
358% Outstanding
Read 2,136
Write 1,037
Mixed 1,590
SusWrite 2138
387% 1,725 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 61.4
215% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,708
DQ Write 1,696
DQ Mixed 1,759
1,306% 1,721 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 358%
Great: 389%
Lacie Mobile Drive 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 121 122 122 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 85
Write 114
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 117
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
162% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$74
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 157 157 160 159 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 145
Write 153
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 153
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
469GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 111 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 129
Write 124
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 111
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 76%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
425GB free, PID 0212
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 85.1
Write 86.5
Mixed 35
SusWrite 86.3
98% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GIS Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GIS 32GB
2100, 2100, 2100, 2100 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 39.3
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 30.1
SC Write 45.4
SC Mixed 34.7
105% 36.7 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 114%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 15,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $181

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback