Ncstech CK3-A425

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNcstech CK3-A425  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 13:13
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 164
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 313
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1
Splatting 2
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS060G32MNB-2000A 60GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10103L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 139 148 137 133 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.8% Below average
Read 221
Write 163
Mixed 146
SusWrite 137
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 19.5
62% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 79.3
DQ Mixed 24.5
26% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
214GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 74 76 75 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 89.8
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 74.1
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 88%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
14GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.9 8.4 9 8.5 8.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
4.67% Terrible
Read 17.6
Write 7.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 8.3
12% 9.85 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.67%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CK3-A425 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Ncstech CK3-A425

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback