Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 21 months ago.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 22:00
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 85%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 137
60% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 582
60% 483 Pts
64-Core 715
44% 715 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$294
Asus(1043 86D2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.1% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 104
Parallax 121
90% 112 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 102
Splatting 94.9
84% 104 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$34
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 17 52 3.1 7.7 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 310
Write 148
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 15.6
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 17.9
53% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 61.2
DQ Mixed 1.4
24% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
120GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 142 142 127 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 145
Write 124
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 140
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Portable 2TB
617GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 105 104 103 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 74.8
Write 107
Mixed 72
SusWrite 104
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 20.1
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 20
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $339
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback