Lenovo Lenovo H330

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo Lenovo H330  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 17:47
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 153
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 274
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Sapphire(174B E217) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.1% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 36
Parallax 41.6
26% 36.7 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 23.8
22% 27.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 60 59 56 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.5% Average
Read 243
Write 63.4
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 58.4
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 23.4
88% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 79.2
DQ Mixed 103
86% 129 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
355GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 102 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 102
67% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Lenovo H330 Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo Lenovo H330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $103
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback