Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140623
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 14:50
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 76%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Memory 47.1
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 78.8
35% 56.8 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 130
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 34.2
27% 34.3 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 36
Splatting 24.1
25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z220
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 203 222 226 187 192 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.4% Average
Read 277
Write 237
Mixed 206
SusWrite 205
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 8.9
48% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 77.4
78% 127 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 86%
SSD 128GB
96GB free
Firmware: S5FA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 134 158 145 156 149 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.7% Poor
Read 184
Write 101
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 136
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 5.2
26% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 66.7
DQ Write 32.8
DQ Mixed 2.9
15% 34.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 85%
Kingston SKC6001024G 1TB
419GB free
Firmware: S450
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 228 245 244 205 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 301
Write 254
Mixed 262
SusWrite 225
59% 261 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 22.7
75% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 136
121% 183 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
222GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 132 135 134 135 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 144
Write 114
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 132
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
57GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 84 84 83 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 83.3
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 126 135 135 119 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 122
Write 126
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 125
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
184% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 188
Mixed 90.9
105% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Corsair CMY16GX3M2A1866C9 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
26% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.4
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback