Itautec Infoway w7430

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemItautec Infoway w7430  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel W7430
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 13:22
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Memory 49.9
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 41.2
27% 38.2 Pts
4-Core 70.4
8-Core 73.2
10% 71.8 Pts
64-Core 73.5
4% 73.5 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Quanta(152D 0809) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.2
1% 1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 57 41 27 45 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 206
Write 92
Mixed 112
SusWrite 50.5
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 13.5
42% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 59.6
DQ Mixed 63.2
55% 83.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 45%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
13GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 61 60 60 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 72.4
Write 75.1
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 59.9
47% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMT325S6EFR8A-PBHJ SH564568FH8NWPHSFR 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.2% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.2
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Infoway w7430 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Itautec Infoway w7430

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback