Medion S15449

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion S15449  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION M15T
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210409
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 09:10
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 81.2
1-Core 160
2-Core 297
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 708
73% 586 Pts
64-Core 690
43% 690 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1E39 A025) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 29.7
19% 26.9 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 22.3
23% 28.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-512G-PHISON-SSD-B27-07 512GB
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 539 539 535 543 544 548 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 915
Write 549
Mixed 501
SusWrite 541
140% 627 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 34.8
134% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 416
304% 394 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 128%
Great: 164%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 27.5
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 18.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S15449 Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Medion S15449

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback