Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100824
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '17 at 14:34
Run Duration	285 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 77.1 1-Core 42.2 2-Core 83.5 45% 67.6 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 225 24% 192 Pts	64-Core 237 15% 237 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% EVGA(3842 C862) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	4.54% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 7.81 Parallax 1.94 4% 5.05 fps	MRender 8.19 Gravity 4 Splatting 5.65 5% 5.95 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.54% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 43187 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 302 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 95 95 176 (AE) Unknown 100 100 142 (B5) Unknown 100 100 107876796357629 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 83 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 161 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 95 95 5 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	47.8% Average	Read 331 Write 256 Mixed 195 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 4.25 59% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 88.1 DQ Mixed 5.34 19% 38.6 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 74%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 133 133 34387919279 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5301 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 30291 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 115 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5548 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5548 (C2) HDA temperature 146 146 193274576937 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	81% Excellent	Read 134 Write 148 Mixed 4.62 68% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.19 79% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 842GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 3133351 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 11040 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 135 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 21667887 (09) Power-on hours count 39 39 53672 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 547 (B7) Unknown 95 95 5 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 89 1835036 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 52 639631395 (C2) HDA temperature 35 48 55834574883 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 48 16 3133351 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 16797617123994 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3785152363 (F2) Unknown 100 253 191928037	51.6% Above average	Read 92.3 Write 87.5 Mixed 24.6 50% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.32 77% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 68%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 1,113 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 3.5TB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 178 Write 177 Mixed 135 206% 163 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 2.34 4K Mixed 0.28 136% 5.04 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 75%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 1,113 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1.5TB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 148 Write 145 Mixed 133 182% 142 MB/s	4K Read 4.57 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.27 101% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 75%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB 1,597 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 931GB free, PID 3001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 25.1 Write 25.3 Mixed 25.2 33% 25.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.45 76% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 19,207 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM 667 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.3% Poor	MC Read 13 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 11.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 6.5 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 86.1 46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	48x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	40x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	31x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	5x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,822 samples	6x
CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 54 samples	6x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,501 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16