Notebook P17SM-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook P17SM-A  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P17SM-A
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '21 at 10:11
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$46
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 178
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 376
39% 314 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 91 91 89 88 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 441
Write 420
Mixed 331
SusWrite 101
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 45.1
158% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 222
205% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 118%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
504GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 122 122 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 117
Write 104
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 121
66% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-193.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 15.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 19.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P17SM-A Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook P17SM-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback