HP 1000 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 1000 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 188B
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171220
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 13 '21 at 04:50
Run Duration434 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-300 APU-$120
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Memory 47.1
1-Core 13.3
2-Core 26.3
22% 28.9 Pts
4-Core 4.5
8-Core 9.8
1% 7.15 Pts
64-Core 17.9
1% 17.9 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
HP(103C 188B) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.8% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.8%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Generic External 250GB
196GB free (System drive), PID 3960
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 21 20 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
9.26% Terrible
Read 12.9
Write 15.5
Mixed 15
SusWrite 21
23% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
45% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.26%
Great: 199%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-053.A00LF Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
4.31% Terrible
MC Read 0.8
MC Write 0.3
MC Mixed 2.1
3% 1.07 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.6
SC Mixed 0.2
1% 0.33 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 1000 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback