Lenovo 82JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive385% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82JF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '21 at 04:38
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 64.3
1-Core 155
2-Core 304
91% 174 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 766
81% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,167
72% 1,167 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3E87) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
7.86% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 10.3
7% 29.4 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 9.5
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.86%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN810 SDCQNRZ-2T00-1001 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: R4076TAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2747 2657 2875 2664 2519 2160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
385% Outstanding
Read 2,304
Write 2,696
Mixed 1,648
SusWrite 2,604
522% 2,313 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 87.3
325% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 921
DQ Write 618
DQ Mixed 762
570% 767 MB/s
Poor: 385%
This bench: 385%
Great: 547%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-16GRS 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 31.3
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 17
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82JF Builds (Compare 1,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 82JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback