Motherboard H77ITX-A-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics67.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMotherboard H77ITX-A-E  (all builds)
MotherboardZOTAC H77ITX-A-E
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 19:08
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 181
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 510
53% 428 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1631 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.7% Good
Lighting 83.3
Reflection 98.9
Parallax 85.2
68% 89.1 fps
MRender 88.1
Gravity 83.7
Splatting 77.1
67% 83 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 122 107 106 235 216 MB/s
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.3% Good
Read 284
Write 115
Mixed 248
SusWrite 186
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 31.3
111% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 208
177% 256 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40
371GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 87 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 83.3
Write 78.3
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 85.4
54% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73CB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.2
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77ITX-A-E Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Motherboard H77ITX-A-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $797
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback