TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire TC-605

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-605
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140321
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 13:56
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$99
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 90
2-Core 180
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 345
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 66.8%
 Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 18.6
14% 18.2 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 16.9
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 14.2%
 Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD025VS 250GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AZ0U1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 72 68 81 81 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 14.9
Write 50.2
Mixed 12.9
SusWrite 73.1
27% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
66% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 25.2%
 Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-831.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 17.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 18.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 58%
 Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Aspire TC-605 Builds (Compare 982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-605

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel  $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples302x
Core i5-4440Intel  $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples271x
Core i7-4770Intel  $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples109x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples165x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples88x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia  $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples74x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples29x
MX500 500GBCrucial  $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples23x
MX500 1TBCrucial  $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples22x
RAM
ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 2,425 samples116x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 52%, 14,558 samples52x
ACR16D3LU1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 556 samples23x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback