Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 167% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 167% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190603
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '21 at 12:10
Run Duration	485 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$265 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Memory 78.6 1-Core 145 2-Core 288 92% 171 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 1,044 91% 776 Pts	64-Core 1,119 69% 1,119 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Gigabyte(1458 403F) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Lighting 289 Reflection 257 Parallax 295 235% 280 fps	MRender 318 Gravity 240 Splatting 174 192% 244 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 1TB 12,662 User benchmarks, average bench 231% 273GB free (System drive) Firmware: VB411D43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 1048 583 559 468 250 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	225% Outstanding	Read 2,008 Write 1,345 Mixed 1339 SusWrite 559 292% 1,313 MB/s	4K Read 47.8 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 65.6 210% 71.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,211 DQ Write 805 DQ Mixed 1,084 788% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 330%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 61GB free Firmware: 521ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 176 173 172 174 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 345 Write 212 Mixed 254 SusWrite 172 55% 246 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 84.3 4K Mixed 40.1 147% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 206 154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 87%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 21GB free Firmware: 521ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 186 216 230 218 221 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Read 359 Write 193 Mixed 280 SusWrite 207 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 81.2 4K Mixed 37.8 142% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 233 174% 233 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 94%
Sandisk PLUS 120 120GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 111GB free Firmware: UE45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 164 88 84 83 82 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 377 Write 201 Mixed 236 SusWrite 119 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 23.6 4K Mixed 15.1 56% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 77.2 DQ Mixed 41.6 46% 77.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 43%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 387GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 478 482 472 471 484 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 439 Mixed 390 SusWrite 476 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 83.2 4K Mixed 55 172% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 354 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 238GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 111 111 110 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 119 Write 116 Mixed 62.8 SusWrite 110 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 707GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 34.1 Write 40.9 Mixed 34.6 SusWrite 11 23% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 1.1 231% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 67%
ST950032 5AS 500GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 155GB free, PID 70f5 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 35.1 Write 38.7 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 10.7 36% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 19%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 14GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 38 37 37 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 36.4 Write 34.1 Mixed 27.6 SusWrite 36.6 46% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 43%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 239GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 40.3 Write 32.6 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 10.7 37% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 42%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1.5TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 35.1 Write 32.9 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 10.4 33% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.2 37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GB 3,127 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 23.8 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 21.3 64% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,866x
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,487x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,392x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $490Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	515x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	503x
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	445x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	360x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	262x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	223x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	183x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $895

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16