TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z490-A PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 239%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 249%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics216% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive379% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C75
MotherboardMSI Z490-A PRO  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211020
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 10:19
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900KF
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 185
2-Core 339
111% 205 Pts
4-Core 718
8-Core 1,331
122% 1,025 Pts
64-Core 1,869
116% 1,869 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑
This bench: 113%
 Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
MSI(1462 3897)
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
216% Outstanding
Lighting 323
Reflection 289
Parallax 330
263% 314 fps
MRender 345
Gravity 265
Splatting 190
210% 267 fps
Poor: 162% ↑
This bench: 216%
 Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1334 1331 1458 1469 1498 1469 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
379% Outstanding
Read 2,690
Write 2,293
Mixed 1,794
SusWrite 1,426
459% 2,051 MB/s
4K Read 73.9
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 106
367% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,780
DQ Write 1,414
DQ Mixed 1,575
1,185% 1,590 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑
This bench: 379%
 Great: 410%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
451GB free
Firmware: SBFK61F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 436 449 456 105 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 451
Mixed 365
SusWrite 330
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 44.1
164% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 220
191% 283 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
1TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 360 359 360 357 360 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 38.6
119% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 36.2
107% 37.3 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 117%
 Great: 119%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z490-A PRO (MS-7C75) Builds (Compare 20,396 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z490-A PRO - $190

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel  $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples4,757x
Core i5-10600KIntel  $129Bench 92%, 70,951 samples2,308x
Core i7-10700KFIntel  $200Bench 96%, 37,394 samples1,484x
GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples2,585x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples1,723x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples1,646x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples874x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD  $149Bench 228%, 180,890 samples767x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples556x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples957x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples588x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples567x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,047
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback