EVGA X58 3x SLI Classified 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 46% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA X58 3x SLI Classified 3  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110825
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 02 '17 at 02:06
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%
CPU Throttled 46%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499
Socket 423, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 38.9
2-Core 72.8
45% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 221
23% 183 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.8.1
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.6% Below average
Lighting 46.3
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 76.8
38% 59.8 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 45.8
43% 53.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HPT DISK 0_1 256GB
147GB free
Firmware: 4.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
106GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.1% Average
Read 262
Write 127
Mixed 189
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 16.7
75% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 84
DQ Mixed 40
46% 79 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 82%
Patriot Torch 240GB-$73
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM08.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 262
Write 16.8
Mixed 172
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 7.84
56% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 99.7
DQ Write 71.8
DQ Mixed 20.9
33% 64.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 77%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
46GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44% Average
Read 259
Write 135
Mixed 181
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 17.8
70% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 76.1
DQ Mixed 44
45% 74.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 44%
Great: 82%
HPT DISK 0_2 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 4.00
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 181
Mixed 179
145% 193 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 2.78
4K Mixed 0.83
187% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 114%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
3TB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 142
Write 143
Mixed 137
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.31
94% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 113%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
1TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 31
Mixed 31
40% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.21
75% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 16.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.6
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 3x SLI Classified 3 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

Motherboard: EVGA X58 3x SLI Classified 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $482
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback