EVGA X58 3x SLI Classified 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA X58 3x SLI Classified 3  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '17 at 01:10
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499
Socket 423, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 95
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 133
68% 107 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 176
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1415 MHz, MLim: 1770 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.8.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.2% Average
Lighting 59.3
Reflection 71.4
Parallax 74.2
48% 68.3 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 52.8
Splatting 56.6
48% 58.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HPT DISK 0_1 256GB
147GB free
Firmware: 4.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
106GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.6% Above average
Read 258
Write 127
Mixed 189
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 21.8
93% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 45
62% 112 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 82%
Patriot Torch 240GB-$73
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM08.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.1% Below average
Read 265
Write 10.5
Mixed 240
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 8.22
66% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 21.6
55% 115 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 77%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
46GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.8% Above average
Read 264
Write 131
Mixed 197
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 21.6
93% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 44.8
60% 110 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 82%
HPT DISK 0_2 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 4.00
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 219
Write 183
Mixed 183
147% 195 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.82
4K Mixed 0.89
190% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 115%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
3TB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 120
Write 147
Mixed 135
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.3
93% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 113%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
1TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 33
Write 31.9
Mixed 19.6
35% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.22
70% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 17.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 3x SLI Classified 3 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

Motherboard: EVGA X58 3x SLI Classified 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $482
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback