Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory8.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateDec 11 '21 at 15:13
Run Duration342 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 167
72% 118 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 397
40% 325 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 10C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 5.8
4% 13.8 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 0
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 36 36 60 60 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 88.4
Write 91.5
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 48.4
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
70% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 70%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 2TB
853GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 19 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 37.7
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 20.7
24% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 109%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 19 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 38.9
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 20.7
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.9% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 28.6
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 24.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback