| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | To Intel X79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190717 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 11 '21 at 11:13 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.5%
Good
|
53% 85.3 Pts
|
36% 289 Pts
|
25% 409 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.9%
Above average
|
52% 71.6 fps
|
48% 60.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
567GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1232 1573 1561 1533 1535 1563 MB/s
|
195%
Outstanding
|
320% 1,413 MB/s
|
132% 43.4 MB/s
|
193% 258 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 54 52 52 55 MB/s
|
29.2%
Poor
|
35% 46.9 MB/s
|
122% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-012.A 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
79%
Very good
|
90% 31.4 GB/s
|
28% 9.9 GB/s
|
48% 83.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,974 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Intel X79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 505x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 215x |
| Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples | 95x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 140x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 112x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 91x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $158 |