JW JW-PH67A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardJW JW-PH67A  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120423
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 11:45
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 93
2-Core 183
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 365
43% 335 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1005 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 15.5
13% 18.1 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 0.2
10% 14.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 157 75 4.6 73 41 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.5% Poor
Read 256
Write 218
Mixed 231
SusWrite 82.9
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
842GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 181 182 185 186 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 147
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 182
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical JW-PH67A Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: JW JW-PH67A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $208
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback