Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU502LW
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 11:19
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 249
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 765
78% 628 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 174F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6172
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 116
Parallax 119
97% 118 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 114
Splatting 102
95% 118 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 90%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 90 191 96 61 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 861
Write 787
Mixed 744
SusWrite 160
143% 638 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 48.7
170% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 611
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 288
265% 415 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 118%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 22.2
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 25.2
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW Builds (Compare 1,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback