Alphasync 1137247

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 193%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 232%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAlphasync 1137247  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 10:33
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 83.7
1-Core 175
2-Core 351
107% 203 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 1,296
116% 980 Pts
64-Core 2,744
170% 2,744 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
189% Outstanding
Lighting 243
Reflection 252
Parallax 489
198% 328 fps
MRender 378
Gravity 198
Splatting 287
234% 288 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 189%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB
516GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 965 955 960 955 943 908 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 953
Write 2,830
Mixed 663
SusWrite 948
307% 1,348 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 59
226% 91.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,435
DQ Write 937
DQ Mixed 1,044
817% 1,139 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 218%
Great: 492%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 179 171 165 165 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 128
Write 157
Mixed 152
SusWrite 171
113% 152 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 CMWX16GC3600C18W2D CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 CMWX16GC3600C18W2D 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 85.9
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 31.3
142% 49.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 32
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1137247 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 194%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 232%
UFO

System: Alphasync 1137247

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback