Intel S5000PSL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel S5000PSL  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 02:35
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5405
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Memory 47.5
1-Core 29.5
2-Core 63.8
30% 46.9 Pts
4-Core 99.6
8-Core 96.6
13% 98.1 Pts
64-Core 94.8
6% 94.8 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
XFX(1682 2451) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 2.9
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 6.2
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel MegaSR 237GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 50 117 120 138 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.8% Excellent
Read 194
Write 126
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 111
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
8.41% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 1.97 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 8.41%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S5000PSL Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel S5000PSL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback