Medion E32014

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMedion E32014  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B460H6-EM
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 14:14
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 258
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 685
75% 593 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1E39 D012) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 7.6
5% 7.33 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 1
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S11-512G-PHISON-SSD-B27 512GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 417 449 458 455 454 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 229
Write 104
Mixed 125
SusWrite 447
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 12.2
68% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 76.3
DQ Write 22.9
DQ Mixed 22
23% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
29GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 151 110 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 436
Mixed 374
SusWrite 159
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 50.5
168% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 89F7 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 24.8
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E32014 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E32014

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback