Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 23:11
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 72.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 274
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 1,013
93% 777 Pts
64-Core 2,189
136% 2,189 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Device(107D 2769) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.1% Very good
Lighting 95.4
Reflection 110
Parallax 98.8
78% 101 fps
MRender 95.1
Gravity 95.6
Splatting 97.3
79% 96 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,831
Write 2,538
Mixed 2,356
574% 2,575 MB/s
4K Read 76.3
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 101
329% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,262
DQ Write 997
DQ Mixed 1,106
834% 1,121 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 389%
WDC WD140EDFZ-11A0VA0 14TB
10.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 199 196 198 199 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 191
Write 201
Mixed 144
SusWrite 196
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 1
16% 5.37 MB/s
DQ Read 2
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 1.1
3% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 26%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
149GB free
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,827
Write 3,220
Mixed 3,001
676% 3,016 MB/s
4K Read 79.3
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 109
356% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,324
DQ Write 1,068
DQ Mixed 1,175
885% 1,189 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
WD My Book 25ED 14TB
10TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 197 192 193 190 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 207
Mixed 204
SusWrite 194
277% 202 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 1.4
382% 7.37 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 8.5
DQ Mixed 1.8
355% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 1TB
979GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.4 9.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6% Terrible
Read 16.9
Write 0.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 8.6
7% 6.85 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6%
Great: 7%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
27GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 150
Write 31.2
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 31.8
78% 71 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.2
222% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 38.1
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 35.7
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback