Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210710
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '21 at 22:11
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	MKD-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$139 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Memory 93.2 1-Core 130 2-Core 261 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 515 8-Core 764 80% 640 Pts	64-Core 730 45% 730 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8598) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.5% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 107 Parallax 98.1 85% 103 fps	MRender 91.8 Gravity 97.3 Splatting 94.1 77% 94.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 306 308 313 309 312 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 312 Mixed 296 SusWrite 309 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 96 4K Mixed 38.7 151% 56.1 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 238 207% 308 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 150GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 80 78 78 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60% Above average	Read 132 Write 93.3 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 77.2 60% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80.5% Excellent	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 23 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 17.9 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	95x
Core i5-8400Intel $129Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	89x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	39x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	49x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	15x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	12x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16