ZET WARD H117

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemZET WARD H117  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MAG B560M BAZOOKA (MS-7D18)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 21:04
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 87.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 257
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 756
78% 627 Pts
64-Core 1018
63% 1018 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 2489) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 181
Parallax 188
154% 186 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 141
Splatting 121
120% 151 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 134%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM6B.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 328
Mixed 329
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 28.8
129% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 187
169% 255 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 102%
Palit UVS 240GB
49GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 174 107 106 106 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 271
Write 106
Mixed 335
SusWrite 169
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 35.1
134% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 221
192% 283 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 84%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
78GB free
Firmware: AX003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 54.1
Write 49
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 53.2
33% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.4% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 17.9
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 20.9
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WARD H117 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine

System: ZET WARD H117

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback