ZET WARD H117

Performance Results


Gaming 116% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	ZET WARD H117 (all builds)
Motherboard	Micro-Star MAG B560M BAZOOKA (MS-7D18)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210705
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '21 at 19:36
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 83.7 1-Core 126 2-Core 248 84% 152 Pts	4-Core 493 8-Core 791 79% 642 Pts	64-Core 1,010 62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 2489) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Lighting 188 Reflection 180 Parallax 170 153% 179 fps	MRender 192 Gravity 140 Splatting 121 120% 151 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB 30,264 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM6B.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 154 114 114 51 37 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 439 Write 191 Mixed 331 SusWrite 107 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 29 129% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 186 170% 256 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 102%
Palit UVS 240GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 49GB free Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 105 133 105 54 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 450 Write 354 Mixed 356 SusWrite 127 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 35.3 133% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 218 191% 284 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 84%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 79GB free Firmware: AX003M SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 53 53 53 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 51.7 Write 9.9 Mixed 23.6 SusWrite 52.2 25% 34.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB 87,891 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.8% Good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 18.3 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 34.9 SC Mixed 20.5 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WARD H117 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 100%

Nuclear submarine

System: ZET WARD H117

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	21x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	20x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1x

SSD
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	13x
SNVS250G 250GBKingstonBench 160%, 4,574 samples	4x
Micron_5100_MTFDDAK960TCC 960GBBench 89%, 50 samples	1x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	15x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	3x
DDR4 3200 4x8GBAdataBench 91%, 25,190 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $36
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16