Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 17:15
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 203
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 463
61% 459 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 5
4% 5.23 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gamer V TA1D0120A 120GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 46 28 50 28 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.9% Average
Read 281
Write 215
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 52.7
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 25.5
53% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 96.5
105% 173 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 87%
Gamer V TA1D0120A 120GB
47GB free
Firmware: SBFM81.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 225 207 228 233 231 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 444
Write 268
Mixed 283
SusWrite 227
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 33.3
126% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 201
176% 263 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V02D4L84GB5285282400 859B CB8GU2400.C8JT 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.8% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 21.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 18.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback