HP ProDesk 600 G3 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G3 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 829D
Memory22.1 GB free of 28 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201018
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 08:19
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$88
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 206
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 407
53% 400 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 829D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9416
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 8.2
6% 7.57 fps
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 11.3
9% 9.35 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 373 349 349 364 360 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 455
Mixed 426
SusWrite 327
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 43.5
144% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
584GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 177
Write 49.5
Mixed 41.6
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A5244CB0-CRC 28GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.6% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 23.2
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 20.7
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G3 MT Builds (Compare 555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G3 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback