Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171228
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 18:06
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7640X-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 282
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 546
70% 532 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 509 254 288 253 200 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,995
Write 1,447
Mixed 583
SusWrite 277
237% 1,076 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 55.1
224% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,061
DQ Write 1,039
DQ Mixed 795
667% 965 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 211%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 134 145 146 147 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 92
Write 127
Mixed 70
SusWrite 139
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 90%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
769GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 94 95 93 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 73.1
Write 63.5
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 93
94% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 859B BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 26.1
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 26.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback