Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory16.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 14:10
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 147
45% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 583
54% 448 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 40
Parallax 24.5
14% 27.4 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 15.7
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 252 265 248 255 234 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 934
Write 292
Mixed 384
SusWrite 253
102% 466 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 27
116% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 289
228% 321 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 103%
Great: 153%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
890GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 121 129 128 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 77
Write 110
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 123
65% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.5
156% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 24GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 21.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 16.9
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback