Asrock X79 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X79 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140213
Uptime	10.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '17 at 00:50
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 91.6 2-Core 182 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 565 54% 446 Pts	64-Core 834 52% 834 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Asus(1043 04B0) CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.4 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.5% Average	Lighting 47.7 Reflection 64.1 Parallax 69.2 39% 60.3 fps	MRender 61.9 Gravity 46.9 Splatting 52.1 44% 53.6 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79 10,862 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 64GB free Firmware: X21200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 8718 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 207 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 34 (A8) Unknown 100 100 42 (A9) Unknown 100 100 504 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 17 (AE) Unknown 100 100 131 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 56 240519282727 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 56 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 4554 (F1) Unknown 253 253 4020 (F2) Unknown 253 253 5655 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	61.3% Good	Read 268 Write 257 Mixed 260 59% 262 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 23.7 85% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 63.7 84% 152 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 114%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225 3,223 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTRAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	53.2% Above average	Read 265 Write 241 Mixed 259 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 17.8 65% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 106 99% 153 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 106%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: MK7OA840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	84.1% Excellent	Read 149 Write 144 Mixed 110 100% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.47 133% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 82%
Seagate ST32000644NS 2TB 7,161 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 106GB free Firmware: GG18 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 81 63 155306187 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 162 (05) Reallocated sector count 98 98 84 (07) Seek error rate 52 51 133150079761 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 9683 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 188 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 53 52 791412783 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 118 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 549 (C2) HDA temperature 47 48 73014444079 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 24 17 155306187 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 5 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 5 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	50.2% Above average	Read 85.7 Write 89 Mixed 53.7 56% 76.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.35 91% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 3x4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 25.7 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 11.7 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme4 - $290

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	87x
Core i7-3930KIntel $195Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	51x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	25x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	23x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GBSamsungBench 201%, 5,877 samples	10x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 4x4GBCorsairBench 52%, 780 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS 2x8GBCrucialBench 43%, 2,652 samples	9x
Vengeance DDR3 2x8GBCorsairBench 44%, 2,237 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $818

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359