HP 635 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 635 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3579
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111213
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 31 '17 at 20:07
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II P650 Dual-Core
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 75.1
41% 61.9 Pts
4-Core 75.2
8-Core 74.7
10% 74.9 Pts
64-Core 74.7
5% 74.7 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
HP(103C 3579) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.3% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.51 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.65
0% 0.48 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.3%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$79
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
45% Average
Read 83
Write 73.7
Mixed 74.5
58% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.31
79% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 635 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 635 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback