Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T935

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK T935  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB288
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '21 at 11:05
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 186
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 175
27% 197 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 1898) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 4.2
4% 3.73 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.8
2% 3.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 256GB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 353 366 337 334 336 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 383
Write 336
Mixed 335
SusWrite 341
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 18.5
68% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 47.4
92% 179 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK T935 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T935

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback