Foxconn H77M/H77M-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive16.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardFoxconn H77M/H77M-S  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '21 at 03:49
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 158
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 424
44% 351 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84AC) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 21.1
17% 20.3 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 23
Splatting 17
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 79 69 58 73 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.2% Very poor
Read 86
Write 75.9
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 71.5
16% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 6.8
25% 8.6 MB/s
DQ Read 12
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 13.2
10% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
449GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 114
Write 118
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 125
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77M/H77M-S Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H77M/H77M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $472
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback