Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U757

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK U757  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2A5
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime23.6 Days
Run DateDec 05 '21 at 12:59
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7600U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 212
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 298
41% 303 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Fujitsu(10CF 1959) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4639
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 6.5
6% 6.4 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.5
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1130 1071 594 590 617 623 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,126
Write 1020
Mixed 940
SusWrite 771
217% 964 MB/s
4K Read 65.2
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 89.6
302% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,218
DQ Write 676
DQ Mixed 883
674% 925 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 228%
Great: 340%
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
815GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 277 310 287 291 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 274
Write 230
Mixed 228
SusWrite 288
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 23.8
69% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 62.7
71% 120 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 118%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 123 127 125 126 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 82
Write 109
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 123
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.6
156% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.4% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 23.2
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK U757 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U757

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback