Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory43.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateDec 05 '21 at 07:21
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 134
55% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 435
40% 338 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 188
Parallax 184
132% 178 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 182
Splatting 130
122% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 480GB-$89
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 283 25 121 17 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 414
Write 376
Mixed 306
SusWrite 110
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 0.8
37% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 73.6
DQ Write 37.1
DQ Mixed 1.2
15% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 99%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
616GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1097 421 154 234 163 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,182
Write 1,073
Mixed 980
SusWrite 373
202% 902 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 51.5
164% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 543
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 471
342% 449 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 141%
Great: 282%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 127 128 127 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 121
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 126
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.1% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 35.4
108% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 14.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,081 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $939
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback