LG 17Z90P-K.AA78A1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLG 17Z90P-K.AA78A1  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 17Z90P
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 20:54
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 61.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 236
75% 140 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 615
60% 493 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1854 0402) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Lighting 29
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 31.3
24% 29.8 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 32.3
Splatting 21.2
21% 26.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2033 2277 2056 2107 1291 1156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,387
Write 2,149
Mixed 1,668
SusWrite 1,820
450% 2,006 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 80.1
262% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,018
DQ Write 789
DQ Mixed 855
652% 887 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 328%
Great: 338%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 61.9
MC Mixed 43.5
140% 48.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 15.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 123%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 17Z90P-K.AA78A1 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: LG 17Z90P-K.AA78A1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback