Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 17:01
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 176
2-Core 341
109% 203 Pts
4-Core 678
8-Core 1,164
112% 922 Pts
64-Core 1,569
97% 1,569 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.9% Average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 80.8
51% 67.8 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 63
Splatting 44
44% 55.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 355 347 344 346 341 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 454
Mixed 425
SusWrite 351
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 58.1
193% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 111%
Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
138GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,739
Write 2623
Mixed 1,961
544% 2441 MB/s
4K Read 71.7
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 101
340% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,403
DQ Write 1,149
DQ Mixed 1,248
942% 1,267 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
USB3.0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 186
Write 182
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 71.3
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
146% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 104%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
296GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 176 186 147 170 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 52.3
Write 88.1
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 167
61% 84 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 110%
USB3.0 160GB
147GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 71.6
Write 69
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 71.3
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.8% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 19.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 23.3
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,005
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback