Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 00:30
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 73.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 266
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 1,022
88% 752 Pts
64-Core 1,403
87% 1,403 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.5% Average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 79.9
50% 66.5 fps
MRender 58.6
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 43.6
44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 338 342 341 348 344 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 450
Mixed 434
SusWrite 348
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 57.6
191% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 193
146% 197 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 110%
Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
139GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,709
Write 2,612
Mixed 1,971
541% 2,431 MB/s
4K Read 70.1
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 101
335% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,316
DQ Write 1,108
DQ Mixed 1,202
903% 1,209 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
USB3.0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 186
Write 188
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 71.6
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 74%
Great: 104%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
296GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 177 186 169 145 184 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 102
Write 104
Mixed 29
SusWrite 166
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 110%
USB3.0 160GB
147GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41% Average
Read 70.7
Write 66.4
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 71.6
47% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback