Biostar TPower I55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar TPower I55  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 02:54
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 520
60% 466 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1401 MHz, MLim: 1927 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 43
Parallax 59.8
37% 49.4 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 44.8
43% 54.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 236 160 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61% Good
Read 201
Write 109
Mixed 138
SusWrite 133
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 34
119% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 152
122% 169 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 136 136 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 129
Write 134
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 132
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.5
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TPower I55 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar TPower I55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $379
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback