HP 550-159nb

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 550-159nb  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B47
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 19:11
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 212
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 624
64% 516 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 10.3
10% 12.6 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 13.4
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 153 151 145 97 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 473
Write 158
Mixed 180
SusWrite 131
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 31.7
130% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 181
155% 233 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 109 111 117 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 74.1
Write 105
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 111
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 67%
General UDisk 32GB
25GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 6.7 7.9 9.4 9.4 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 10
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 7.7
13% 9.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698651-154-MCN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-159nb Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-159nb

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback